The Supreme Court on Wednesday left in place a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in May to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by power plants. In a brief order, the justices turned ...

The Supreme Court in June 2022 found that the EPA did not have the authority to implement such a regulatory scheme. Under the new measure, the EPA chose carbon capture as the best system of ...

Oil and natural gas companies for the first time will have to pay a federal fee if they emit dangerous methane above certain ...

At the beginning of October, the Supreme Court declined to block two Biden administration environmental ... gas playing a ...

The Supreme Court’s rulings were the latest in a series of surprising wins for the EPA in recent weeks on the high court’s emergency docket. Earlier this month, the court let stand Biden ...

According to the Sierra Club, the Supreme Court’s decision “allows implementation of the EPA’s carbon emission standards to proceed while litigation on the merits is ongoing in the lower court.” The ...

The National Resources Defense Council disagreed with the looseness of the EPA’s definition and challenged the regulation in ...

States, industry challenged EPA rule on carbon emissions Rule mandates 90% emission cut by 2032 for certain plants Oct 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Wednesday to put on hold a ...

Justice Samuel Alito has slammed the door on overeager Republicans’ hopes for a Trump-packed Supreme Court.

Supreme Court justices said earlier this week they ... and won a case regarding their building a home near Priest Lake. EPA says the half-acre lot the couple built their home on contains wetlands ...

The Biden administration issued a new fee on climate-warming methane pollution, but the EPA regulation faces an uncertain ...

After last year’s Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, there remains confusion regarding ...