The ruling backs up a decision from earlier this year, and adearance to the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. But AI platforms ...

Non-human machines cannot be authors under the Copyright Act of 1976. The human authorship requirement does not entirely preclude copyright eligibility for works created with the assistance of AI, ...

Confirming the position of the Copyright Office and past precedent considering the possibility of non-human authors, the ...

The copyright provision in the Constitution was adopted in 1789. Since that time, we've seen the development of photography, sound recordings, film and computers. AI is a link in this chain. Copyright ...

Judge Beryl Howell in a memorandum opinion [PDF] granted the US Copyright Office's motion for summary judgment, noting that ...

A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, saying that at least initial human authorship is required for a copyright.

A federal appeals court unanimously ruled that AI-generated works without human involvement do not qualify for copyright ...

More than 420 entertainment industry insiders, led by Natasha Lyonne, signed an open letter urging the government to uphold ...

Can a non-human machine be an author under the Copyright Act of 1976? In a March 18, 2025 precedential opinion, a D.C. Circuit panel affirmed prior determinations from the D.C. District Court and the ...

A US judge rejected songwriter Adam Stone's claim that 'All I Want For Christmas Is You' was a copy of his own track ...