The Medical-Legal Partnership (MLP) model promotes direct services and public policy advocacy by lawyers incorporated into medical teams. Drawing on personal experiences, this Essay proposes that to ...

The Medical-Legal Partnership (MLP) model promotes direct services and public policy advocacy by lawyers incorporated into medical teams. Drawing on personal experiences, this Essay proposes that to ...

In this Exchange, Daniel S. Harawa and Michael R. Ulrich examine the implications of United States v. Rahimi for the future of Second Amendment rights. Together, these pieces reveal how Rahimi exposes ...

Had the critical legal studies movement never existed, it would have to be invented today. That movement framed law as a forceful instrument of domination but one compatible with both functional and ...

The prevalent academic critique of arbitration, the access-to-justice critique, fails to account for arbitration’s influence on how firms organize themselves. This Note offers a new critique of ...

In much of the American West, local special districts with undemocratic governance structures and archaic boundaries dominate water governance. In some places, they are expanding their reach into new ...

I had the great fortune to clerk for Justice O’Connor in the 2001-02 Term, and I was struck by how she managed to achieve the utmost professional success while still living life to its fullest. Each ...

abstract. Universal vacatur, the judicial power to void a regulation, is a remedy rooted in the foundations of modern administrative law, not an artifact of judicial overreach or creative ...

abstract. The glaring gap in tort theory is its failure to take adequate account of liability insurance. Much of tort theory fails to recognize the active and central role that liability insurance ...

abstract. Critiqued as a blank check for judicial intervention, the absurdity canon has been all but abandoned by modern textualists. But this Note argues that its total dismissal is unwarranted. By ...

Three cases, Johnson v. M’Intosh, 1 decided in 1823; Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 2 decided in 1831; and Worcester v. Georgia, 3 decided in 1832, all authored by Chief Justice Marshall and collectively ...