The Court held that a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not be imposed while the quantum appeal was still pending before the ITAT. The penalty was stayed for being premature under Section ...
The Court held that even though pre-deposit compliance was disputed, the appellate authority had decided the case on merits. Since the merit findings were not shown to be unreasonable, no interference ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback