The Trump administration is rapidly canceling hundreds of grants, in the most aggressive attack yet on American science.
Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...
The cut in indirect costs is far from the only concern. Funding for new grants also slowed to a trickle after the NIH halted ...
A District Court judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against the administration’s plan to cap so-called indirect ...
The proposed NIH funding cuts, totaling at least $4 billion per year, threaten that leadership. As the heads of two major research medical centers and as physician researchers ourselves ...
The analysis lands at a time when the Trump administration has announced plans to cut billions of dollars in biomedical research funding. The move, announced this month, would drastically cut NIH ...
The National Institutes of Health is terminating dozens of studies examining why people are hesitant about vaccines and how ...
It has been determined they do not align with NIH funding priorities related to vaccine hesitancy and/or uptake.” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the new secretary of NIH’s parent agency, the ...
Thus, it came as a shock to these institutions when the NIH, based on a new Trump administration policy, announced Feb. 7, that it intends to cut the funding used to support the grantee ...
A federal judge in Massachusetts extended the pause on the Trump’s administration’s cuts to NIH funding on Wednesday.
MORE: Judge blocks Trump administration's move to cut billions in NIH scientific funding "This award no longer effectuates agency priorities," all of the letters read. "Research programs based on ...
On March 5, a U.S. district judge in Boston issued a nationwide injunction blocking the administration from implementing the proposed cuts to NIH funding, arguing that the planned cuts were unlawful.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback