The Trump administration is rapidly canceling hundreds of grants, in the most aggressive attack yet on American science.
Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...
Thus, it came as a shock to these institutions when the NIH, based on a new Trump administration policy, announced Feb. 7, ...
The cut in indirect costs is far from the only concern. Funding for new grants also slowed to a trickle after the NIH halted ...
Proposed NIH funding cuts could impact UAB and Alabama's economy, potentially leading to job losses and reduced medical ...
The proposed NIH funding cuts, totaling at least $4 billion per year, threaten that leadership. As the heads of two major research medical centers and as physician researchers ourselves ...
A District Court judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against the administration’s plan to cap so-called indirect ...
MORE: Judge blocks Trump administration's move to cut billions in NIH scientific funding "This award no longer effectuates agency priorities," all of the letters read. "Research programs based on ...
A federal judge in Massachusetts extended the pause on the Trump’s administration’s cuts to NIH funding on Wednesday.
Thus, it came as a shock to these institutions when the NIH, based on a new Trump administration policy, announced Feb. 7, that it intends to cut the funding used to support the grantee ...
On March 5, a U.S. district judge in Boston issued a nationwide injunction blocking the administration from implementing the proposed cuts to NIH funding, arguing that the planned cuts were unlawful.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback